Close this search box.

The Festive Face-Off: Aldi’s Christmas Dinner Price Claim Unwrapped by Watchdog

Once upon a time in the land of supermarkets, a festive feud unfolded that captured the imagination of shoppers far and wide. Aldi, known for its treasure trove of bargains, proudly proclaimed it offered “Britain’s cheapest Christmas dinner,” a claim that sparkled like a star atop a Christmas tree. This bold assertion was made in a dazzling four-page newspaper ad, complete with a confident assertion that consumer group Which? had crowned its festive feast 20% cheaper than that of Sainsbury’s.

But lo and behold, Sainsbury’s, a rival supermarket with aisles full of its own yuletide delights, raised an eyebrow at this festive proclamation. “Can this be so?” they wondered, as they challenged Aldi’s merry claim with the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), the guardians of truth in advertising. They questioned the veracity of Aldi’s claim, suggesting it was as slippery as ice on a winter’s day.

Aldi, caught in the spotlight, defended its claim with the vigor of a Christmas elf protecting Santa’s workshop. They argued that their festive price tag was based on an independent comparison by Which?, painting a picture of a Christmas dinner that would leave wallets heavier and spirits lighter.

Yet, the ASA, wielding their scepter of scrutiny, declared that Aldi’s advert might lead merry shoppers to believe they could find no cheaper Christmas dinner in all the land, effectively discouraging them from exploring other supermarkets’ festive offerings. They also highlighted that the Which? comparison showed Aldi’s dinner was merely a mince pie crumb cheaper than Lidl’s, by just 4p, and both were awarded “budget-friendly Christmas dinner” titles rather than an outright cheapest crown.

Adding a twist to the tale, Sainsbury’s pointed out that the price comparison was conducted at the end of November, not capturing the likely price fluctuations as shoppers rushed to buy fresh ingredients closer to Christmas Day. The ASA agreed, finding the ad’s timing as misleading as a partridge in a pear tree.

The news of this ruling sent ripples through the supermarket kingdom, arriving at a time when price wars were fiercer than a snowball fight, with every store vying for the loyalty of festive shoppers.

This wasn’t the first tussle in the supermarket saga. There had been previous skirmishes, such as Tesco and Lidl’s logo lawsuit and Marks & Spencer’s caterpillar cake clash with Aldi. It seemed the aisles were alive with the sound of competition.

In response to the ASA’s decision, Aldi expressed disappointment, labeling it an “advertising technicality” but remained steadfast in its belief that its baskets brimmed with savings. Which?, whose endorsement was unintentionally entangled in this tinsel-tangled drama, expressed disappointment at the misuse of its logo and findings.

Sainsbury’s, on the other hand, welcomed the ruling with the satisfaction of sipping a perfectly brewed cup of Christmas tea. They stressed the importance of customers making informed decisions, content that the ASA had untangled the misleading threads of Aldi’s festive advertisement.

As the dust settled on this holiday hullabaloo, shoppers were reminded that the quest for the perfect Christmas dinner was as varied and personal as their holiday traditions. Whether drawn to Aldi’s aisles or Sainsbury’s selections, the spirit of the season called for joy, generosity, and a dash of savvy shopping to craft the perfect festive feast.